Tag Archives: ship and let ship

I am so dreadfully tired of all these “"antis”“ who think that it’s charming and noble to dictate to other people what stories they’re allowed to tell and how they are and are not allowed to play make believe.

It’s not charming. It’s tedious and tiresome.

♦ It’s good to write fiction and make art about queer characters.

♦ It’s good to write romantic fiction and make romantic art about queer characters.

♦ It’s good to write sexual fiction and make sexual art about queer characters.

♦ Even if you aren’t out.

♦ Even if no one knows you’re queer.

♦ Even if you aren’t queer.

♦ Nobody needs to know your sexuality before you are allowed to write or create art.

♦ Trying to control who gets to write or enjoy queer art and fiction segregates queer art and fiction.

♦ Trying to control who gets to write or enjoy queer art and fiction stigmatizes queer art and fiction.

♦ Trying to control who gets to write or enjoy queer art and fiction forces people to out themselves.

♦ Trying to control who gets to write or enjoy queer fiction makes queer creators unsafe.

♦ Anybody can create queer art and fiction.

Dear police.

I am writing to you to confess to the heinous crime of having written fiction in which imaginary characters commit and befall many actions of a perverse, obscene and illegal nature.

I remit myself to your custody and your justice for these many gruesome acts of illegal pretend committed against innocent characters.

Not!

Catch me if you can, coppers!

Signed,

A writer

One of the smaller things I hate about (most) anti is how.. in denial they are about their own hypocrisydo some people who are proship not take criticism well? Yeah, but that’s generally not because they’re proship it’s because they either didn’t what the criticism (not all criticism is welcome, especially when on something done for fun) or just aren’t good with dealing with it. It’s happens it’s not a “group specific thing”, it’s just people.(You’s are general)you tell some to die? Not criticism you are at best, being an asshole.someone tells you your troll fic “wasn’t fun”, that is criticism, and vaild. Especially when it already breaks site (ao3) rules.You tell someone that their miss tagged work made you uncomfortable and they should fix the mistake? That’s not an entirely unreasonable request, and yet could be considered criticism. You tell someone that their correctly tagged work made you uncomfortable and they shouldn’t write it? Not criticism, you ignored tag and warnings that were put in place for you. If you’re uncomfortable that’s fine, nothing wrong with that but that doesn’t remove the right of the work.I guess I’m just tired of people getting mad, because someone didn’t like the criticism they left on a work they did for fun and didn’t even want criticism on.criticism isn’t a bad thing, but it needs to be used in the right places and times. Someday AU fanart doesn’t need a 3 page eassy on why is “so uncanon”

Well said, anon.

It’s always okay to feel that something is: icky, gross, upsetting, disturbing, disgusting, repellant, triggering, nasty, weird, unsightly or in bad taste.

What isn’t okay is: insulting that thing to it’s creators face, wishing violence on that thing’s creator and people who support them, claiming the person who created it is a bad person for making it, telling people they arent allowed to make or enjoy things that you personally dont like.

blackheart-biohazards:

❤️‍🔥 There is nothing special and bad about sex in fiction.

❤️‍🔥 Abusive, ‘nasty’, illegal, or taboo sex in fiction isn’t any worse than anything else bad in fiction.

❤️‍🔥Reading or writing about a type of sex in fiction will not program you to want that sex in real life.

❤️‍🔥 It will not program you to think that bad sex is okay in real life.

❤️‍🔥 Reading writing or enjoying a type of sex in fiction does not mean you want to have that sex in real life.

❤️‍🔥 Sex is not a special magical category by itself.

❤️‍🔥 If you claim sexual fiction causes rape, pedophilia or incest IRL you are saying the same thing as “videogames cause violence.”

You know what I find stupid about antis bringing up the age thing though, you know the “She’s legal! She’s over 6,000-years-old!” is that they not only say it unironically, but they act like everyone is saying it unironically as an excuse for “pedophilia.” I have never in my life, since it’s conception, ever seen someone say the “6,000-years-old loli” joke as a legit excuse to lude a character. It was a joke, a literal edgy joke.But no, antis not only ruin it by taking it seriously, but by putting it into people’s mouths who never said anything about it.Not to mention, it doesn’t support their argument about how stuff like this “normalizes pedophilia,” when no human can live to be 6,000. We barely manage to reach 100, let alone any child.(Side note, it also really means jackshit when it involves immortal/non-human creatures. They’re not real so the correlations to that and pedophilia makes no sense.)

Anon, I’m going to be real with you.

I’m in the fandom that has a lot of actual 6000 year old dragon lolis in it. (Fire Emblem).

And lots of people (outside anti communities) create lewd work of the 6000 year old dragon loli characters.

and that’s fine.

What someone is saying when they claim that sexual content of 6000 year old dragon lolis is pedophilic what they are saying is that

  • they believe attraction to people with immature features is inherently pedophilic
  • they believe attraction to people with childish or immature behaviors is inherently pedophilic.

And we have been over why a mindset like that is inherently ableist and bigoted.

You can’t say adults who look childish don’t deserve sex and romance.

You can’t say adults who behave like children don’t deserve sex and romance.

6000 year old dragon lolis are not children. They’re not real, they’re characters, and they’re not even child characters.