Tag Archives: fandom discourse

blackheart-biohazards:

If you are a person who:

  • Has violent, abusive, harmful, or destructive thoughts
  • Enjoys having violent, abusive, harmful, or destructive thoughts
  • Enjoys fiction with violent, abusive, harmful, or destructive characters
  • Creates fiction with violent, abusive, harmful, or destructive chacters

And you do not actually do any violent, abusive, harmful or destructive actions

You are not a bad person.

You are a good person.

Thoughts and fiction do not define morality.

Actions define morality.

Having or enjoying bad thoughts or bad fiction doesn’t mean you will act on those feelings.

Liking negative themes in fiction or having daydreams about harmful actions will not cause you to do harm.

Thoughts and fiction aren’t harmful.

♦ It’s good to write fiction and make art about queer characters.

♦ It’s good to write romantic fiction and make romantic art about queer characters.

♦ It’s good to write sexual fiction and make sexual art about queer characters.

♦ Even if you aren’t out.

♦ Even if no one knows you’re queer.

♦ Even if you aren’t queer.

♦ Nobody needs to know your sexuality before you are allowed to write or create art.

♦ Trying to control who gets to write or enjoy queer art and fiction segregates queer art and fiction.

♦ Trying to control who gets to write or enjoy queer art and fiction stigmatizes queer art and fiction.

♦ Trying to control who gets to write or enjoy queer art and fiction forces people to out themselves.

♦ Trying to control who gets to write or enjoy queer fiction makes queer creators unsafe.

♦ Anybody can create queer art and fiction.

“Proship” means you don’t believe people should be harassed, threatened or insulted for the fiction and art they create, even if you personally find what they’re making to be gross, upsetting or in some way immoral.

“Proship” means you believe that all fiction and art has a right to exist, and should be available to access for those who want to see it, and available to be blocked and avoided by those who don’t want to see it.

That’s everything proship means.

Ship and let ship.

Don’t like? Don’t read.

Antis: who do you trust to be in charge of censoring out things that you find harmful, without censoring things that you don’t find harmful, but others may?

Please answer, remembering that you can not personally be in charge of this. This is a genuine question.

Is there an authority that you trust to censor out what you consider harmful depictions of dark or sexual topics, who you also trust not to censor all art about abuse and suffering, and trust not to censor all depictions of queer relationships?

Your blog has inspired me to create stuff for fandoms I’m in (even if I’m the only one who will see it) I always felt like I would be kicked outta spaces for expressing myself because I was in groups with fancops when I was a teenager.It was only recently I heard the terms proship and fancops so now I’m glad to finally feel like I can enjoy fandom how I want and know that the whole Fandom isn’t against me.

We are so glad that we’ve inspired you, anon, and made you feel safer to share your creations.

We don’t care what people are creating, we just want everybody to be able to create and share what they want to, and to enjoy the fruits of others creativity.

We are all in this together. <3

I lowkey get Bad Vibes from people who are like “be critical about your interests!!” “I dont trust fans of x that arent critical!!”Like How Would You Know and Why Do You Care-Aubrey from @antiproshipping

Right? it always seems like “be critical of your interests” is code for “you’re not allowed to have fun”.

i fucking hate proship/anti discourse because i feel like the fact that those words even exist is fucked up. it takes an issue (that people are drawing porn of underage characters and posting that shit on the internet) and turns it into fandom discourse that sounds silly and absurd to anyone not involved deeply in fandom. if you go on twitter and say shit like “drawing CP is bad” you’ll get people telling you actually, it’s not real, so it’s ok. it’s wild. it’s not ok legally or morally to draw and post porn of underage characters on the internet and it’s not ok to defend it. labelling your passion for CP as being a “proshipper” because “fiction doesn’t affect reality” is absurd. how about you use your critical thinking skills and ponder the complex and fascinating relationship between fiction and real life. or how about you use your brain at all and realise that you should not be shipping a teen and an adult in their 30s, even if theyre fictional. proshippers get a life challenge

#i dont like talking about this shit too much but i do have a lot of thoughts on it#yeehaws#proship discourse#this might be the last i say about it for a while because i fucking hate it#literally just be a decent human with empathy and understanding and be nice to others

  1. If you are in the USA, it is absolutely legal to draw or write about fictional underage characters having sex. The only time it’s illegal is if it’s an image that is indistinguishable from a photograph.
  2. Whether you think its moral to create fiction that depicts immoral behavior is a subjective question. Most normal people think that’s fine.
  3. Calling it “CP” is extremely dismissive to actual survivors of CSA. Comparing drawings to actually child sexual exploitation material is extremely dismissive to the suffering of actual survivors of CSA.
  4. antis get a life and tell fiction apart from reality for once challenge.
  5. claims he doesn’t like to start discourse, writes an anti-proship discourse screed.

“Oh hell yeah! A fic author who sets a boundary without being a dick about it!” *Is a teenager who writes smut* “…Welp, at least they aren’t a dick unlike most fic authors on here.”*blocked*

Can’t win ‘em all!

I wish teenagers who wrote smut knew not to go around telling everyone how old they are.

“On the internet nobody knows you’re a dog” as we used to say.