Tag Archives: tagging discussion

You ever just come across a fic with tags you’re iffy about at first but then read on anyways? And then the story is so good that by the end of it, it instantly hits you that the author used the wrong tags?Cause that happened to me once, I read a really good fic awhile back and by the end of it something didn’t feel right. And it was the tags. I thought to myself, “…Honey no, you wrote agre, not dumbification.”

To me this sounds like a case of the reader interpreting the text in a way other than the interpretation that the original author intended.

Which is always totally fine. The author is “dead” after all.

This is exactly the reason why you can’t assume you know that someone is trying to “glorify” or “glamorize” a dark topic when they write about it.

The text is always up to interpretation. The text can always be read in a way the author did not intend.

What is triggering content?

We talk a lot about how antis don’t seem to understand that the things that make them upset are comforting to some people, and the things that are comforting to them are upsetting and traumatic to some people.

We also talk about how it’s okay to block anyone for any reason.

Yesterday we had to block someone who was a frequent poster in one of our favorite fandom tags.

This person was not doing ANYTHING wrong by posting their content. It was all correctly tagged and 100% legal, and allowed by tumblr’s TOS.

But their posts were extremely triggering to Toko, to the point where he was getting extremely upset any time we’d see their content in the tag, which was frequently.

What were they posting?

Posts about loving, happy, normal nuclear families. Posts about pregnancy, and babies, and being excited to be a mother. Posts about being the mother of small children.

Totally normal, twee, cutesy, heteronormative comfortable family and romantic posts.

And they had Toko on the verge of a breakdown due to his own trauma. Seeing that particular kind of content, over and over again, specifically for certain characters was extremely triggering for him. Made him feel nauseous, anxious, upset, and genuinely unsafe.

So we blocked that person.

They were not doing anything wrong.

You NEVER know what kind of content is going to be upsetting or triggering for someone. What is extremely wholesome content to you might be extremely repellent and upsetting, and triggering to another person.

Just because you are uncomfortable with one type of content doesn’t mean someone else is.

One person might be triggered by violent, sexual, aggressive or strange content, and another person, like us, like Toko, might find that same content comforting and safe.

Another person might be triggered by what you think is wholesome.

Please think about that before you try to tell people what kind of content they are or aren’t allowed to post according to you.

Is it true that censoring potential triggers with asterisks, numbers and letters makes it more harder for people with reading disabilities to read and people will fill in the blanks and know what the word is anyways?

Yes, its absolutely true.

It also makes it harder or impossible for people who are triggered by those things to create strong filters online to keep from seeing them.

If you’re talking about rape, and you write it r*pe, then someone who has the word “rape” filtered will now SEE THAT POST that they were trying to avoid.

Censoring words that way is explicitly useful for GETTING AROUND FILTERS on sites that automatically filter those words. Censoring them is to avoid machine censorship so that the topics can be discussed, it is not to help people who don’t want to see them.

On a site like tumblr that doesn’t autocensor topics like that the best thing you can do is write them out fully so that people who are trying to filter them out can do so.

Please remember:

♦ No person is sole arbiter of what is or isn’t disgusting, upsetting, triggering, or immoral.

♦ What you feel is wholesome and comforting can be disgusting, upsetting, triggering, or immoral to another person.

♦ There is no arbitrary set of rules to enforce that can make everyone feel comfortable and safe.

♦ Please tag your content accurately so that the people who want to find it can find it, and the people who want to filter it can filter it.

♦ If you see content that makes you uncomfortable, please filter or block it, and move on.

♦ Dwelling on the existence and details of content that makes you uncomfortable and upset is never healthy, and can only make you more upset.

What’s your opinion on people posting problematic content in main fandom tags?

plague-of-insomnia:

blackheart-biohazards:

Tags are for organizational purposes.

Tags are not communities.

If people don’t tag their problematic content with the main fandom tags, then it not only becomes unsearchable, it also becomes unfilterable.

What if I hate undertale, and I don’t want to see any undertale posts?

If people who post problematic undertale content don’t tag it as undertale, then I can’t filter it out, and I end up with a bunch of problematic undertale content on my dashboard that I’d rather avoid.

Use the main tags.

The main tags are for everyone.

Tags are not a community.

If you really want a community tag that isn’t for problematic posts then post them as “#fandomname community” or something.

TAGS ARE INFORMATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL.

TAGS ARE NOT COMMUNITY.

If people don’t tag their problematic content with the main fandom tags, then it not only becomes unsearchable, it also becomes unfilterable.

I CANNOT STRESS THIS ENOUGH.

I have so many posts, most by antis, fall through my filters bc they refuse to tag properly or they censor things.

Tags are used to find but also filter, and it’s just good fandom etiquette to tag properly (or just don’t tag at all so it won’t appear in the main tags)