Tag Archives: shipping discourse

Just a reminder:

♦ Any content that is not against Tumblr’s TOS is allowed in the ‘main tag’ of a relevant fandom.

♦ It is not your duty or right to police the content of tumblr’s tags beyond what breaks tumblr’s TOS.

♦ If you don’t like something that’s in a tag, block or filter it.

♦ You are not the tag police.

“Proship” means you don’t believe people should be harassed, threatened or insulted for the fiction and art they create, even if you personally find what they’re making to be gross, upsetting or in some way immoral.

“Proship” means you believe that all fiction and art has a right to exist, and should be available to access for those who want to see it, and available to be blocked and avoided by those who don’t want to see it.

That’s everything proship means.

Ship and let ship.

Don’t like? Don’t read.

words-of-holly:

In light of certain reblogs to this account, I feel like I should clear something up for people who might be questioning or thinking some things about me.

In my description, I use the term “ship and let ship,” which means I don’t care what your favorite pairings are, or what your headcanons are, or what your favorite characters are, etc. You can like whatever you want in fiction; it’s fiction, after all, and we’re not responsible for other people’s inability to separate that from their own reality.

Pro-shippers use this term in a similar fashion. Now, while the term “pro-ship” in and of itself means anti-harassment and anti-censorship in fiction, there is a largely negative connotation surrounding the term due to the amount of community members who are openly into or who support paraphilias. Therefore, I do not like to consider myself pro-ship, because I do not want to be associated with a label that will warrant nothing but hate despite whether or not I fall into that category.

All in all, pro-shippers just want to be left alone so they can enjoy their fictional worlds in their own way. Not all of them condone paraphilias or rape fantasies or abuse or anything else that might be seen as “problematic” in the eyes of fandom. What they stand for is what the old fandoms stood for; you do your thing, they do their thing, and if you don’t agree, then you simply move on. You don’t harass or try to tell someone what content they can or cannot produce. That is censorship and will lead to more problems in the future rather than fix anything.

I believe in letting people enjoy whatever they please in a fictional setting where no real person will be harmed. If this means someone writes about non-consensual situations or other forms of abuse, then that is perfectly fine. The majority of writers or artists do this as a coping mechanism to deal with their own trauma. We are not romanticizing your trauma by dealing with our own.

If this stance makes you unfollow or block me, then I wish you all the best.

Again, I do not label myself as a pro-shipper because of the stigma around it and because of the content a lot of users in that community produce. I simply do not care if your opinions differ from mine and will not waste my energy attacking someone over a piece of fiction.

Remember: fiction only has the power to affect reality because we make it so; if you cannot separate your fictional fantasies from your own reality, then that is your problem and is not the content creator’s responsibility.

This all being said, this blog is a safe place for pro-shippers so long as you do not attempt to introduce paraphilia into my space. You can do whatever you want on your own blog, and I will block and blacklist tags as I must, but do not bring it to me.

Antis: who do you trust to be in charge of censoring out things that you find harmful, without censoring things that you don’t find harmful, but others may?

Please answer, remembering that you can not personally be in charge of this. This is a genuine question.

Is there an authority that you trust to censor out what you consider harmful depictions of dark or sexual topics, who you also trust not to censor all art about abuse and suffering, and trust not to censor all depictions of queer relationships?

👉 Creating or consuming fiction does not lead to taking action in the real world.

👉 Consuming fiction about things that are against your morals does not change your firmly held morals.

👉 Creating or enjoying fiction about immoral, taboo or disgusting actions does not mean that you want to take part in those actions in real life.

👉 Whether or not the fiction in question is about sex or contains sexual content does not change any of the above.

Sometimes I look at the way I ship things in cookie run and I remember why the fandom would crucify me immediatelyI ship Sparkling and Vampire as a dimmer ship because, let’s be real, there’s too much potential for exploitation with a bartender and an alcoholic, no matter how fluffy the tag is. Then there’s one-sided shipcest but not canon shipcest if that makes sense… I like to think Fire Spirit is Cinnamon’s ancestor but that Cinnamon doesn’t know that and has a crush on Fire Spirit but Fire Spirit is aro and also knows they’re related but can’t tell him. I ship this for hilarity. Is funny to me. The only ship I have in CR that isn’t toxic is Milk and Purple Yam, where Milk is supporting his boyfriend who’s living with severe PTSD. Also I can’t resist a little selfcest. I just can’t. Croissant x Timekeeper, I will go down with this ship.

Pal, we don’t go here, and we don’t know nothing about this series, but you keep on shipping these toxic cookies no matter what. You got our blessing.

I like the companion ship term but it’s a little vague on its own. Without context it sounds like shipping two friends. What about something likeHybrid ShipCrossbreed or xbreed ship

Hybrid ship and crossbreed/xbreed ship both sound too much like they’re referring to potential offspring of the couple, which I personally find squicky and others might too.

Dog ship or feral ship?

I kinda like companion ship though. I feel like animals are more often called companions than friends are these days.

–🐸☠

All the ship terms has got me wondering. When I ship I just see two characters and put them together without ever thinking of ages. I often get squicked when people insist I’m shipping adultxminor or minorxminor and force me to consider their ages; I just see it as shipping two dolls and dolls don’t have ages just an appearance and a personality or story if you want to keep it.Would a word situation for that be useful at all? At the very least to help give a warning sign “ages don’t exist here” I don’t know what I’m saying or how to say it.It’s just something that keeps bothering me with fancops and their insistence that fictional things have “real ages” you -have- to acknowledge at all times it’s made fandom harder and harder. I know I can’t be the only one who goes fiction doesn’t have ages, but in the case of being super squicked about it maybe I am alone. Everything’s gotten me questioning everything these days. Sorry to drop in your box!

Hmm, I have no idea. There certainly might be a use for a term for “I don’t consider their ages when shipping them, and it doesn’t come up in the fic” if only for people who don’t like that to filter it out.

Maybe something like void ship or just ship?

♥ I love you fans with fluffy ships.

♥ I love you fans with canon ships.

♥ I love you fans with popular ships.

♥ I love you fans with rare ships.

♥ I love you fans with self ships.

♥ I love you fans with problematic ships.

♥ I love you fans with dark ships.

♥ I love you fans with toxic ships.

♥ I love you fans with taboo ships.

I love you fans who ship and let ship! 💖