kawaii-pigeon:

uncle-cazador:

bigcountry1775:

uncle-cazador:

ophilosoraptoro:

gsirvitor:

I’m honestly still waiting for this SpED to either get tired of begging for my attention or to pick up a dictionary or bettet yet, a book on laws.

The one thing that gets me though is the fact she’s construed my recitation of what incest is, to be me supporting actual incest, when you can’t actually find any evidence of me doing so in the thread, no you only find me referring to it as wrong along side my condemnation of step sibling sex by referring to it as taboo and morally wrong.

Incest is wrong, step siblings fucking is wrong, however the latter is not incest.

Gsirvitor: literally says that incest is wrong.

Celtyradicalfem: “Omg, why would you justify incest? I was trolling btw.”

Why do you guys still interact with them?

What’s the verdict on BJs? Incest or not incest?

Are you high?

Blood relation – incest

Not blood relation – no incest

@blackheart-biohazards @sl-ug radfems and anti intersection sure is interesting.

Also yeah, agree with uncle Cazador.

So okay. Come on this journey with me.

A parent hates the person that their child is dating.

That parent can marry the parent of the person their child is dating to force them to break up, because their relationship, which was previously normal, is now incest.

Right?

Right?

No. Antis and radfems are really stupid.